Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem - disturbance, development and the Steady State, based on the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study. [Peter Ashton's copy]

Bormann, F.H. & Likens, G.E.

ISBN 10: 0387903216 / ISBN 13: 9780387903217

Edité par Springer, New York, Heidelberg & Berlin, 1979

A propos de cet article

A few illustrations and charts, octavo, pp xiv, 253, the top edhe and the fore-edge a little foxed, very slightly used internally, green decorated cloth, slightly rubbed, very slightly worn. [From the library of the botanist and forest ecologust Peter Ashton, with a presentation note signed by the first author. ]. {The advent of ecosystem ecology has created great difficulties for ecologists primarily trained as biologists, since inevitably as the field grew, it absorbed components of other disciplines relatively foreign to most ecologists yet vital to the understanding of the structure and function of ecosystems. From the point of view of the biological ecologist struggling to understand the enormous complexity of the biological functions within an ecosystem, the added necessity of integrating biology with geochemis- try, hydrology, micrometeorology, geomorphology, pedology, and applied sciences (like silviculture and land use management) often has appeared as an impossible requirement. Ecologists have frequently responded by limiting their perspective to biology with the result that the modeling of species interactions is sometimes considered as modeling ecosystems, or modeling the living fraction of the ecosystems is considered as modeling whole ecosystems. Such of course is not the case, since understanding the structure and function of ecosystems requires sound understanding of inanimate as well as animate processes and often neither can be under- stood without the other. About 15 years ago, a view of ecology somewhat different from most then prevailing, coupled with a strong dose of naivete and a sense of exploration, lead us to believe that consideration of the inanimate side of ecosystem function rather than being just one more annoying complexity might provide exceptional advantages in the study of ecosystems. To examine this possibility, we took two steps which occurred more or less simultaneously.}.

N° de réf. du vendeur 022718

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem - disturbance, development and the Steady State, based on the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study. [Peter Ashton's copy]
• Éditeur: Springer, New York, Heidelberg & Berlin
• Date de parution: 1979
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 0387903216
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9780387903217
• Reliure: Cloth
• Édition: First Edition.
• État de l'article: Good
• Signé: Signed by Author
• Catalogues du vendeur:
  • Forestry
  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Trees and Shrubs

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

The advent of ecosystem ecology has created great difficulties for ecologists primarily trained as biologists, since inevitably as the field grew, it absorbed components of other disciplines relatively foreign to most ecologists yet vital to the understanding of the structure and function of ecosystems. From the point of view of the biological ecologist struggling to understand the enormous complexity of the biological functions within an ecosystem, the added necessity of integrating biology with geochemis- try, hydrology, micrometeorology, geomorphology, pedology, and applied sciences (like silviculture and land use management) often has appeared as an impossible requirement. Ecologists have frequently responded by limiting their perspective to biology with the result that the modeling of species interactions is sometimes considered as modeling ecosystems, or modeling the living fraction of the ecosystems is considered as modeling whole ecosystems. Such of course is not the case, since understanding the structure and function of ecosystems requires sound understanding of inanimate as well as animate processes and often neither can be under- stood without the other. About 15 years ago, a view of ecology somewhat different from most then prevailing, coupled with a strong dose of naivete and a sense of exploration, lead us to believe that consideration of the inanimate side of ecosystem function rather than being just one more annoying complexity might provide exceptional advantages in the study of ecosystems. To examine this possibility, we took two steps which occurred more or less simultaneously.