Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 26)

Hintikka, Jaakko; Kulas, J.

ISBN 10: 902772055X / ISBN 13: 9789027720559

Edité par Springer, 1985

A propos de cet article

xii + 250 pages. Glossy stiff paper binding is sound and tight. There are rubber stamps and stickers from a university linguistics department collection, but the book appears to remain unread, and there are no markings on the interior pages. Originally S. Y. Kuroda's copy with his address label.

N° de réf. du vendeur UUU41

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 26)
• Éditeur: Springer
• Date de parution: 1985
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 902772055X
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9789027720559
• Reliure: Soft cover
• Édition: 1st Edition
• État de l'article: Good
• Catalogues du vendeur:
  • Linguistics

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

I n order to appreciate properly what we are doing in this book it is necessary to realize that our approach to linguistic theorizing differs from the prevailing views. Our approach can be described by indicating what distinguishes it from the methodological ideas current in theoretical linguistics, which I consider seriously misguided. Linguists typically construe their task in these days as that of making exceptionless generalizations from particular examples. This explanatory strategy is wrong in several different ways. It presupposes that we can have "intuitions" about particular examples, usually examples invented by the linguist himself or herself, reliable and sharp enough to serve as a basis of sharp generalizations. It also presupposes that we cannot have equally reliable direct access to general linguistic regularities. Both assumptions appear to me extremely dubious, and the first of them has in effect been challenged by linguists like Dwight Bol inger. There is also some evidence that the degree of unanimity among linguists is fairly low when it comes to less clear cases, even in connection with such relatively simple questions as grammaticality (acceptability). For this reason we have tried to rely more on quotations from contemporary fiction, newspapers and magazines than on linguists' and philosophers' ad hoc examples. I also find it strange that some of the same linguists as believe that we all possess innate ideas about general characteristics of humanly possible grammars assume that we can have access to them only via their particular consequences.

À propos de l?auteur

Jaakko Hintikka is the author or co-author of thirty volumes and of some 300 scholarly articles in mathematical and philosophical logic, epistemology, language theory, philosophy of science, history of ideas and history of philosophy, including Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant, Peirce, The Bloomsbury Group, Husserl and Wittgenstein. He has also been active in international scholarly organizations, most recently as the First Vice-President of FISP, Vice-President of IIP and Co-Chair of the American Organizing Committee of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. He has been Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal Synthese and the Managing Editor of Synthese Library since 1965.