The Difference Between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy. Cet article n’est pas disponible.
102 évaluations par Goodreads
Langue : anglais
Edité par State University of New York Press, Albany, 1977
- Éd. originale
- Livre relié
- Occasion
Image de l’article 1 de 2
Vendeur : Zed Books, New York, NY, Etats-UnisZed Books
Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles
Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 25 avril 2017
Indisponible
Livre relié
Etat: Occasion - Bon
EUR 45,93
A propos de cet article
First printing. 8vo. xxxviii, [214] pp. Brown cloth. Near Fine in Very Good dust jacket. Jacket's rear panel rubbed and scratched, very faint stain along bottom edge of rear panel, a few small tears. Translated by H. S. Harris and Walter Cerf.
N° de réf. du vendeur x09866
- Titre
- The Difference Between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy
- Auteur
- G. W. F. Hegel
- Éditeur
- State University of New York Press, Albany
- Année de publication
- 1977
- État de l'article
- Near Fine
- Jaquette
- Very Good
- Reliure
- Hardcover
- Langue
- anglais
- ISBN à 10 chiffres
- 0873953363
- ISBN à 13 chiffres
- 9780873953368
- Édition
- First Edition.
In this essay, Hegel attempted to show how Fichte's Science of Knowledge was an advance from the position of Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, and how Schelling (and incidentally Hegel himself) had made a further advance from the position of Fichte.
Hegel finds the idealism of Fichte too abstractly subjective and formalistic, and he tries to show how Schelling's philosophy of nature is the remedy for these weaknesses. But the most important philosophical content of the essay is probably to be found in his general introduction to these critical efforts where he deals with a number of problems about philosophical method in a way which is of general interest to philosophers, and not merely interesting to those who accept the Hegelian "dialectic method" which grew out of these first beginnings. Finally, the Difference essay is important in the development of "Nature-Philosophy" as a movement in the history of science.
Hegel finds the idealism of Fichte too abstractly subjective and formalistic, and he tries to show how Schelling's philosophy of nature is the remedy for these weaknesses. But the most important philosophical content of the essay is probably to be found in his general introduction to these critical efforts where he deals with a number of problems about philosophical method in a way which is of general interest to philosophers, and not merely interesting to those who accept the Hegelian "dialectic method" which grew out of these first beginnings. Finally, the Difference essay is important in the development of "Nature-Philosophy" as a movement in the history of science.
« Synopsis » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.
À propos de l’auteur
Walter Cerf is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the City University of New York. H. S. Harris is Professor of Philosophy and Humanities at Glendon College, York University.
« A propos de ce titre » peut appartenir à une autre édition de cet ouvrage.