The Purpose of Excluding Evidence in P.R. China and Switzerland, Exclusionary Rules: Paper Tigers?

Langue : anglais

Edité par Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg, 2021

3339121168 / 9783339121165

  • Éd. originale
  • Livre broché
  • Neuf
Afficher toutes les informations

Vendeur : Verlag Dr. Kovac GmbH, Hamburg, AllemagneVerlag Dr. Kovac GmbH

Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles

Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 24 janvier 2011

Livre broché

Etat: Neuf

EUR 86,80

EUR 17,60 expédition 
Expédition depuis Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Quantité disponible : 5 disponibles

Ajouter au panier
Retours gratuits sous 30 jours

A propos de cet article

Studien zur Rechtswissenschaft, Band 457 186 pages. In 2012, the People"s Republic of China - which in its criminal justice system habitually strives for comprehensive fact-finding in order to hand out punishment to wrongdoers - adopted exclusionary rules. In 2011, just one year earlier than China, Switzerland, a country far removed from China, also established exclusionary rules in its first uniform Swiss Criminal Procedure Code, mainly by codifying rules existent in the cantonal procedural codes or established by the courts long ago. The research intends to find out the rationale for excluding relevant evidence in the two countries. Despite the differences between Chinese and Swiss legal systems, both countries, on one hand, recognize the truth should not be searched at any price; nevertheless on the other hand, both they acknowledge that the common interest of criminal proceedings is to establish the truth. Firstly, this dissertation explains that in the Chinese criminal justice system, exclusionary rules are more concerned with ensuring what could be called a harmonious proceeding than with the fairness of proceedings. A harmonious proceeding refers to that Chinese laws seek to reach an agreement within limits by overcoming dissent and discord and thus to ensure none of the relevant participants losing face (mianzi-é¢å). Secondly, while in Swiss criminal justice system, the hope that exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial is based on a double hypothesis: (a) that legislators intend to ensure a fair trial through excluding evidence; and (b) that the legal framework, at least theoretically, provides a supportive mechanism to safeguard a fair trial. By examining whether the ECtHR provides a common legal framework to determine the admissibility of evidence, the dissertation claims that the Swiss criminal justice system presents a clearer approach to determine the admissibility of evidence. Thirdly, the dissertation explains whether the enforcement of exclusionary rules meets the legislators" expectations in Chinese and Swiss criminal justice system. Despite the different purposes existing in the Chinese and Swiss criminal justice systems, the exclusionary rules reach a similar result in the two countries: the legal authorities have an incentive to comply with procedural rules, since they have to fear the exclusion of evidence. However, the way exclusionary rules are handled a) in Chinese system provides legal authorities alternatives to maintain a harmonious proceeding rather than excluding evidence; while b) in Swiss system gives legal authorities "emergency exitsâ that enable them to reintroduce the balancing approach if needed. Lastly, the dissertation research concludes that the exclusion of evidence does not always work as smoothly in practice as the law on the books.…

N° de réf. du vendeur x12116

Titre
The Purpose of Excluding Evidence in P.R. China and Switzerland, Exclusionary Rules: Paper Tigers?
Auteur
Xinyun Peng
Éditeur
Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg
Année de publication
2021
État de l'article
neu
Reliure
Softcover
Langue
anglais
ISBN à 10 chiffres
3339121168
ISBN à 13 chiffres
9783339121165
Édition
1. Auflage.

Verlag Dr. Kovac GmbH

Hamburg, Allemagne

Vendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoiles

Vendeur AbeBooks depuis 24 janvier 2011

Frais d'expédition de Allemagne vers Etats-Unis

Article16 à 35 jours ouvrés7 à 14 jours ouvrés
Premier articleEUR 17,60EUR 34,35
Les délais de livraison sont fixés par les vendeurs et varient en fonction du transporteur et du lieu. Les commandes transitant par les douanes peuvent être retardées et les acheteurs sont responsables de tous les droits ou frais associés. Les vendeurs peuvent vous contacter au sujet de frais supplémentaires afin de couvrir toute augmentation des coûts d'expédition de vos articles.

Modes de paiement

  • Visa
  • Mastercard
  • American Express
  • Carte Bleue
  • Apple Pay
  • Google Pay

Description de la boutique

Der Wissenschaftsverlag Dr. Kovač wurde 1982 gegründet und ist ein Fachverlag für wissenschaftliche Literatur. Seit mehr als 40 Jahren verlegen Wissenschaftler/innen aus unterschiedlichsten Fachbereichen bei uns. Das Gros der mehr als 12.400 Forscher/innen, die wir verlegen, stammt von Universitäten im deutschsprachigen Raum.

Profil professionnel du vendeur

Verlag Dr. Kovac GmbH

Leverkusenstr. 13
Hamburg, Allemagne 22761

Verlag Dr. Kova? GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Elke Grotzke, Susanne Mielau, Michael Leu
Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 117818

Hausanschrift: Leverkusenstraße 13, 22761 Hamburg
Postanschrift: Postfach 57 01 42, 22770 Hamburg

Telefonnummer: +49-(0)40 - 39 88 80 - 0
Faxnummer: +49-(0)40 - 39 88 80 - 55
E-Mail-Adresse: info[at]verlagdrkovac.de