Self-Reference and Modal Logic / by Craig Smorynski

Smorynski, Craig

ISBN 10: 0387962093 / ISBN 13: 9780387962092

Edité par New York, NY : Springer New York : Imprint: Springer, 1985

A propos de cet article

Very good paperback copy; edges slightly dust-dulled and nicked. Remains particularly well-preserved overall; tight, bright, and clean. Physical description; 333 p. Contents; 0. Introduction -- 1. The Incompleteness Theorems -- 2. Self-Reference -- 3. Things to Come -- 4. The Theory PRA -- 5. Encoding Syntax in PRA -- 6. Additional Arithmetic Prerequisites -- I. The Logic of Provability -- 1. Provability as Modality -- 2. Modal Model Theory -- 3. Arithmetic Interpretations of PRL -- II. Multi-Modal Logic and Self-Reference -- 4. Bi-Modal Logics and Their Arithmetic Interpretations -- 5. Fixed Point Algebras -- III. Non-Extensional Self-Reference -- 6. Rosser Sentences -- 7. An Ubiquitous Fixed Point Calculation. Subjects; Mathematical logic. Mathematical Logic and Foundations. Modality (Logic). Mathematics. Logic, Symbolic and mathematical. Logic, Symbolic and mathematical. Mathematics. Mathematical Logic and Foundations. 1 Kg.

N° de réf. du vendeur 422993

Détails bibliographiques

• Titre: Self-Reference and Modal Logic / by Craig Smorynski
• Éditeur: New York, NY : Springer New York : Imprint: Springer
• Date de parution: 1985
• Langue: anglais
• ISBN à 10 chiffres: 0387962093
• ISBN à 13 chiffres: 9780387962092
• Reliure: Couverture rigide
• Édition: 1st edition.

A propos de ce titre

Synopsis

It is Sunday, the 7th of September 1930. The place is Konigsberg and the occasion is a small conference on the foundations of mathematics. Arend Heyting, the foremost disciple of L. E. J. Brouwer, has spoken on intuitionism; Rudolf Carnap of the Vienna Circle has expounded on logicism; Johann (formerly Janos and in a few years to be Johnny) von Neumann has explained Hilbert's proof theory-- the so-called formalism; and Hans Hahn has just propounded his own empiricist views of mathematics. The floor is open for general discussion, in the midst of which Heyting announces his satisfaction with the meeting. For him, the relationship between formalism and intuitionism has been clarified: There need be no war between the intuitionist and the formalist. Once the formalist has successfully completed Hilbert's programme and shown "finitely" that the "idealised" mathematics objected to by Brouwer proves no new "meaningful" statements, even the intuitionist will fondly embrace the infinite. To this euphoric revelation, a shy young man cautions "According to the formalist conception one adjoins to the meaningful statements of mathematics transfinite (pseudo-')statements which in themselves have no meaning but only serve to make the system a well-rounded one just as in geometry one achieves a well- rounded system by the introduction of points at infinity.