Articles liés à BANGSAMORO QUESTION: AUTONOMY, FEDERALISM OR INDEPENDENCE?:...

BANGSAMORO QUESTION: AUTONOMY, FEDERALISM OR INDEPENDENCE?: The Virtue Of Peaceful 'Two-Nation Theory' as Final Solution To The Bangsamoro Question - Couverture souple

Omar, Ibrahim

 
9783844399400: BANGSAMORO QUESTION: AUTONOMY, FEDERALISM OR INDEPENDENCE?: The Virtue Of Peaceful 'Two-Nation Theory' as Final Solution To The Bangsamoro Question

Synopsis

Bangsamoro Question: Autonomy, Federalism orIndependence?"History is the sum total of the things that couldhave been avoided," said Konrad Adenauer.The past Bangsamoro and Philippine history revealedthat the Spanish, American and Japanese invadersregarded colonization as a solution to subjugate theMoros and to acquire the Bangsamoro homeland ofMindanao, Sulu and Palawan (MINSUPALA) Consequently,similar strategy was applied by theAmerican-installed Philippine Commonwealth governmentin 1935. Without slightest care for moral uprightnessand democratic norm, the Commonwealth regime designedto legitimize the 'colonization' and occupation ofMINSUPALA by a law enacted in the Philippine NationalAssembly. This was Legislative Act No. 4197 ofFebruary 12, 1935 otherwise known as theQuirino-Recto Colonization Act. Thus, following the'colonization' and occupation of Moroland by thePhilippine Commonwealth regime and, eventually, thearbitrary incorporation into the Philippine Republicon July 4, 1946, the agony and suffering of thecolonized Bangsamoro people continued until today.Hence, the raging Filipino-Moro conflict in Mindanaoto date and the need to achieve peace.

Les informations fournies dans la section « Synopsis » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.

Présentation de l'éditeur

Bangsamoro Question: Autonomy, Federalism orIndependence?"History is the sum total of the things that couldhave been avoided," said Konrad Adenauer.The past Bangsamoro and Philippine history revealedthat the Spanish, American and Japanese invadersregarded colonization as a solution to subjugate theMoros and to acquire the Bangsamoro homeland ofMindanao, Sulu and Palawan (MINSUPALA) Consequently,similar strategy was applied by theAmerican-installed Philippine Commonwealth governmentin 1935. Without slightest care for moral uprightnessand democratic norm, the Commonwealth regime designedto legitimize the 'colonization' and occupation ofMINSUPALA by a law enacted in the Philippine NationalAssembly. This was Legislative Act No. 4197 ofFebruary 12, 1935 otherwise known as theQuirino-Recto Colonization Act. Thus, following the'colonization' and occupation of Moroland by thePhilippine Commonwealth regime and, eventually, thearbitrary incorporation into the Philippine Republicon July 4, 1946, the agony and suffering of thecolonized Bangsamoro people continued until today.Hence, the raging Filipino-Moro conflict in Mindanaoto date and the need to achieve peace.

Biographie de l'auteur

Ibrahim S. Omar was born in Maimbung, Sulu, Muslim Mindanao, September 10, 1947. Finished Post Graduate Studies in Institute of Islamic Studies, University of the Philippines Diliman (UPD)and married with 3 children. Peace advocate and freedom fighter in search of peaceful Mindanao. A firm believer that 'there is no substitute to peace.'

Les informations fournies dans la section « A propos du livre » peuvent faire référence à une autre édition de ce titre.