David w manly (26 résultats)

Etat : New.

PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Etat : New.

PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Etat : New.

Etat : New.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Hardback. Etat : New.

HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Etat : New.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Etat : New.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardback. Etat : New.

Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War? Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant? This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War? readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective "scoring" of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general? The answer may not be what you expect. Lee or Grant is a book about the leadership of the two generals that will equally be enjoyed by historians and armchair civil war enthusiats This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Hardcover. Etat : new. Hardcover. Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War? Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant? This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War? readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective "scoring" of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general? The answer may not be what you expect. This book is written for both students of the Civil War and the armchair historian. It gives a simple to understand synopsis of the major battles of Lee and Grant providing an overview of Strategy, Tactics and Casualties. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective 'scoring' of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General.Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach.Who was the superior general The answer may not be what you expect.…

Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War? Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant? This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War? readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective "scoring" of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general? The answer may not be what you expect. Lee or Grant is a book about the leadership of the two generals that will equally be enjoyed by historians and armchair civil war enthusiats This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Etat : new. Paperback. Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War? Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant? This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War? readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective "scoring" of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general? The answer may not be what you expect. Lee or Grant is a book about the leadership of the two generals that will equally be enjoyed by historians and armchair civil war enthusiats This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…

Hardcover. Etat : new. Hardcover. Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War? Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant? This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War? readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective "scoring" of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general? The answer may not be what you expect. This book is written for both students of the Civil War and the armchair historian. It gives a simple to understand synopsis of the major battles of Lee and Grant providing an overview of Strategy, Tactics and Casualties. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.…

Buch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective 'scoring' of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general The answer may not be what you expect.…

Hardcover. Etat : new. Hardcover. Who was the superior General of the U.S. Civil War? Was it Robert E. Lee or Ulysses S. Grant? This is an age-old question military experts and armchair historians continue to debate 150 years after the war. There are numerous books comparing Lee and Grant but most are laborious to get thru and frankly a bit biased by the authors based on their personal loyalty to either the Union or Confederate causes.In Lee or Grant: Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War? readers get a new inciteful and analytical approach to the question. Rather than relying on reputation or traditional narratives, the book breaks down key battles and campaigns, evaluating each commander with clear, consistent criteria covering Strategy, Tactics and Casualty statistics. From early engagements to decisive turning points, each chapter offers a focused analysis of leadership decisions, strengths and missteps-providing readers with a deeper understanding of how these two iconic figures approached war.Written for both history enthusiasts and general readers, the book offers a balanced, accessible, and thought-provoking comparison that invites the you to form your own conclusions.The book provides a brief synopsis of the battles each General led followed by casualty comparisons for both the Union and Confederate forces. Each battle section then ends with a rating of the General's performance on a five-point scale regarding Strategy, Tactics, and Casualties. The result strives to be an objective "scoring" of Lee and Grant's performances that readers can easily understand-and agree or disagree with thus making them participants in the analysis. At the end of the book the scores/rankings of each General are tabulated and summarized to determine who in fact was the Superior General. Lee or Grant also includes brief biographies of both Generals and includes an Epilogue sharing what Lee thought of Grant and vice versa-as well as describing the four in person meetings they had before, during, and after the war.The author of Lee or Grant is a retired business executive-not a scholar-whose hobby is studying the Civil War. He is used to making data-driven decisions based on available facts. Thus his entirely unique approach. Who was the superior general? The answer may not be what you expect. This book is written for both students of the Civil War and the armchair historian. It gives a simple to understand synopsis of the major battles of Lee and Grant providing an overview of Strategy, Tactics and Casualties. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Lee or Grant | Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War | David W Manly | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | David W. Manly | EAN 9798995632818 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.…

Buch. Etat : Neu. Lee or Grant | Who Was the Superior General of the Civil War | David W Manly | Buch | Englisch | 2026 | David W. Manly | EAN 9798995632801 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.