Amendment equal protection (12 résultats)

Etat : Good. Former library copy. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Etat : Very Good. Former library copy. Pages intact with possible writing/highlighting. Binding strong with minor wear. Dust jackets/supplements may not be included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Library Binding. Etat : Fair. The item might be beaten up but readable. May contain markings or highlighting, as well as stains, bent corners, or any other major defect, but the text is not obscured in any way. Ex-Library.

Unknown. Etat : Very Good. No Jacket. Former library book; May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware - Editor Sylvia Engdahl explores a highly controversial topic, the right to equal protection under the law. This right grants everyone protection, but we haven't always granted it equally. Timely essays in this volume debate school segregation, a woman's right in relation to non-consent pregnancy, an unborn child's rights, the rights of children of illegal immigrants, and gay marriage.…

Etat : New.

library. Etat : New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Soft cover. Etat : New. Language:Chinese.Author:QIU XIAO PING.Binding:Soft cover.Publisher:Peking University Press; 1 (January 1. 2005).

Pamphlet. Etat : Very good. John Armor Bingham was closely aligned with the Radical Republicans, although some historians maintain that his positions fell somewhat in between their and the more moderate Unionists. He was active in the abolition movement and that the South had manipulated the Constitution to justify slavery. He served as the Assistant Judge Advocate General in the trial of President Lincoln's assassins, a House Manager (prosecutor) during the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson, and, most significantly, as the principal framer of the Fourteenth Amendment, which gave former slaves the right to vote. His Congressional speeches in this lot are: July 9, 1867 - Reconstruction. (Bingham gave this speech at a pivotal moment in the 40th Congress as Radical and Moderate Republicans debated supplementary legislation to enforce the Reconstruction Acts over the vetoes and resistance of President Andrew Johnson. In it he argued that Congress held the power to outline the parameters of Reconstruction and ensure that Southern governments returned to a "republican form" of government, broke with the Radical republicans by maintaining the treasonous actions of individual Southern leaders or even the majority of rebels could not strip the loyal minority of their inherent rights as American citizens, insisted that antebellum state boundaries remain under the federal framework until loyal civilian governments were re-established, and shaped the debate to protect the civil rights of formerly slaves by forcing Southern states to ensure the civil rights former slaves were maintained and extend the vote to black men before senators and representative were readmitted to Congress and votes in the Electoral College were once more accepted.) March 31, 1871 - The Enforcement of the Constitution and Laws of the United States and the Rights of the People. (Bingham gave this speech during the Congressional debates over the Ku Klux Klan Act (the Third Enforcement Act of 1871), which proposed to give the federal government and President Ulysses S. Grant power to intervene against violent "conspiracies," i.e., the Ku Klux Klan, that were denying freedmen and Union sympathizers their constitutional rights in the South. As the principal author of the Fourteenth Amendment, he defended the proposed act by clarifying the original intent of several clauses within it, specifically arguing that all American citizens were protected by the Bill of Rights, and explaining that the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to make these protections enforceable against any deprivations sponsored or ignored by the states. Both are complete and in nice shape .…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online.Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that Wisconsin Statutes 245.10 (1), (4), (5) (1973) violated the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause. Section 245.10 required noncustodial parents who were Wisconsin residents attempting to marry inside or outside of Wisconsin to seek a court order prior to receiving a marriage license. In order to receive such a court order, the noncustodial parent could not be in arrears on his or her child support, and the court had to believe that the child(ren) would not become dependent on the State.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Zablocki v. Redhail | Zablocki v. Redhail, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Equal Protection Clause | Lambert M. Surhone (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | OmniScriptum | EAN 9786131017568 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Yick Wo v.Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United StatesSupreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but isadministered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the EqualProtection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.In the 1880s, Chinese immigrants to California faced many legal andeconomic hurdles, including discriminatory provisions in the CaliforniaConstitution. As a result, they were excluded, either by law or by biasfrom many professions. Many turned to the laundry business and in SanFrancisco about 89% of the laundry workers were of Chinese descent. In1880, the city of San Francisco passed an ordinance that persons couldnot operate a laundry in a wooden building without a permit from theBoard of Supervisors. The ordinance conferred upon the Board ofSupervisors the discretion to grant or withhold the permits.…