Equal protection clause (38 résultats)

Etat : New.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Etat : New.

Etat : New.

Hardback. Etat : New. For over a century, Congress's power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of "the equal protection of the laws" has presented judges and scholars with a puzzle. What does it mean for Congress to "enforce" such a wide-ranging, open-ended provision when the Supreme Court has insisted on its own superiority in interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment? In Enforcing the Equal Protection Clause, William D. Araiza offers a unique understanding of Congress's enforcement power and its relationship to the Court's claim to supremacy when interpreting the Constitution. Drawing on the history of American thinking about equality in the decades before and after the Civil War, Araiza argues that congressional enforcement and judicial supremacy can co-exist, but only if the Court limits its role to ensuring that enforcement legislation reasonably promotes the core meaning of the Equal Protection Clause. Much of the Court's equal protection jurisprudence stops short of stating such core meaning, thus leaving Congress free (subject to appropriate judicial checks) to enforce the full scope of the constitutional guarantee. Araiza's thesis reconciles the Supreme Court's ultimate role in interpreting the Constitution with Congress's superior capacity to transform the Fourteenth Amendment's majestic principles into living reality. The Fourteenth Amendment's Enforcement Clause raises difficult issues of separation of powers, federalism, and constitutional rights. Araiza illuminates each of these in this scholarly, timely work that is both intellectually rigorous but also accessible to non-specialist readers.…

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

HRD. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardback. Etat : New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Etat : New.

Paperback. Etat : Brand New. reprint edition. 115 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Etat : New. Num Pages: 336 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: LA. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 240 x 164 x 31. Weight in Grams: 658. . 2016. Hardcover. . . . .

Etat : As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Etat : New. In English.

Hardback. Etat : New. For over a century, Congress's power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of "the equal protection of the laws" has presented judges and scholars with a puzzle. What does it mean for Congress to "enforce" such a wide-ranging, open-ended provision when the Supreme Court has insisted on its own superiority in interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment? In Enforcing the Equal Protection Clause, William D. Araiza offers a unique understanding of Congress's enforcement power and its relationship to the Court's claim to supremacy when interpreting the Constitution. Drawing on the history of American thinking about equality in the decades before and after the Civil War, Araiza argues that congressional enforcement and judicial supremacy can co-exist, but only if the Court limits its role to ensuring that enforcement legislation reasonably promotes the core meaning of the Equal Protection Clause. Much of the Court's equal protection jurisprudence stops short of stating such core meaning, thus leaving Congress free (subject to appropriate judicial checks) to enforce the full scope of the constitutional guarantee. Araiza's thesis reconciles the Supreme Court's ultimate role in interpreting the Constitution with Congress's superior capacity to transform the Fourteenth Amendment's majestic principles into living reality. The Fourteenth Amendment's Enforcement Clause raises difficult issues of separation of powers, federalism, and constitutional rights. Araiza illuminates each of these in this scholarly, timely work that is both intellectually rigorous but also accessible to non-specialist readers.…

Etat : New. Num Pages: 336 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: LA. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 240 x 164 x 31. Weight in Grams: 658. . 2016. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Etat : Brand New. 305 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.25 inches. In Stock.

Etat : New.

Buch. Etat : Neu. Neuware - For over a century, Congress's power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of 'the equal protection of the laws' has presented judges and scholars with a puzzle. What does it mean for Congress to 'enforce' such a wide-ranging, open-ended provision when the Supreme Court has insisted on its own superiority in interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment In Enforcing the Equal Protection Clause, William D. Araiza offers a unique understanding of Congress's enforcement power and its relationship to the Court's claim to supremacy when interpreting the Constitution. Drawing on the history of American thinking about equality in the decades before and after the Civil War, Araiza argues that congressional enforcement and judicial supremacy can co-exist, but only if the Court limits its role to ensuring that enforcement legislation reasonably promotes the core meaning of the Equal Protection Clause. Much of the Court's equal protection jurisprudence stops short of stating such core meaning, thus leaving Congress free (subject to appropriate judicial checks) to enforce the full scope of the constitutional guarantee. Araiza's thesis reconciles the Supreme Court's ultimate role in interpreting the Constitution with Congress's superior capacity to transform the Fourteenth Amendment's majestic principles into living reality. The Fourteenth Amendment's Enforcement Clause raises difficult issues of separation of powers, federalism, and constitutional rights. Araiza illuminates each of these in this scholarly, timely work that is both intellectually rigorous but also accessible to non-specialist readers.…

Softcover. Etat : neu. 1. Auflage. Verfassungsrecht in Forschung und Praxis, Band 116 204 pages. Verbotene Diskriminierung, also die ungerechtfertigte Benachteiligung von Individuen oder Kollektiven, ist ein Phänomen, das so alt ist wie die Menschheit; entsprechend vielfältig sind die Ursachen und Theorien hierzu. Dagegen ist positive Diskriminierung, im englischen Sprachkreis unter dem Ausdruck 'affirmative action' bekannt, der Versuch, durch fà rdernde MaÃnahmen die Folgen von Diskriminierung zu mildern, zu kompensieren oder gar umzukehren. Dieser relativ junge rechtswissenschaftliche Themenkomplex ist bereits seit seiner Geburtsstunde Gegenstand unzähliger Dispute und einer weltweit geführten Debatte. Diese Studie analysiert im Wege der Rechtsvergleichung die Unterschiede zwischen 'affirmative action' im amerikanischen Recht einerseits und 'positiver Diskriminierung' im deutschen sowie europäischen Recht andererseits. Da die Rechtskreise durch äuÃerst unterschiedliche soziokulturelle und geschichtliche Hintergründe geprägt sind, setzt sich die Ausarbeitung bewusst allein mit den paradigmatischen Merkmalen des jeweiligen Rechtskreises auseinander, nämlich dem Merkmal 'Geschlecht' in Deutschland bzw. Europa sowie dem Merkmal 'Rasse' in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika. Die Rechtsprechung zu diesen prägenden Merkmalen beinhaltet letztlich allgemeingültige Parameter für alle Formen fà rdernder MaÃnahmen und wird daher auch bei anderen Merkmalen herangezogen.…

Paperback / softback. Etat : New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The Equal Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, provides that 'no state shall . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws'. The Equal Protection Clause can be seen as an attempt to secure the promise of the United States' professed commitment to the proposition that 'all men are created equal' by empowering the judiciary to enforce that principle against the states. 200 pp. Englisch. …

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online.Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that Wisconsin Statutes 245.10 (1), (4), (5) (1973) violated the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause. Section 245.10 required noncustodial parents who were Wisconsin residents attempting to marry inside or outside of Wisconsin to seek a court order prior to receiving a marriage license. In order to receive such a court order, the noncustodial parent could not be in arrears on his or her child support, and the court had to believe that the child(ren) would not become dependent on the State.…

Hardcover. Etat : Brand New. 305 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.25 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Hardback. Etat : New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 638.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. The Local Community Radio Act is an important act of broadcast law in the United States, explicitly authorizing the Federal Communications Commission to license local low-power broadcasting in the FM broadcast band. After five years and four versions, it finally passed the U.S. Congress in 2010, granting equal protection to community radio stations with regard to translator and booster stations. All three types of stations remain secondary to full-power radio stations, which are typically owned by major corporations and nonprofits.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Barr v. Columbia378 U.S. 146 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates reversed the convictions of five African Americans who wererefused service at a lunch counter of a department store based upon aprior Court decision, holding that there was insufficient evidence tosupport a breach of peace conviction and that criminal trespassconvictions would be reversed for the reasons stated in another casethat was decided that same day, Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347(1964). Bouie held that retroactive application of expanded constructionof a criminal statute was barred by due process of ex post facto laws.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Barr v. City of Columbia | Breach of peace, Bouie v. City of Columbia, Due process, Ex post facto, Equal Protection Clause | Frederic P. Miller (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | OmniScriptum | EAN 9786134231176 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Zablocki v. Redhail | Zablocki v. Redhail, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Equal Protection Clause | Lambert M. Surhone (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | OmniScriptum | EAN 9786131017568 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Railway ExpressAgency, Inc. v. New York, 336 U.S. 106 (1949) was a case before theUnited States Supreme Court. A city regulation prohibits advertisingvehicles in city streets, but permits the putting of business noticesupon business delivery vehicles, so long as such vehicles are engaged inthe usual business or regular work of the owner and not used merely ormainly for advertising. A New York City traffic regulation forbids theoperation of any advertising vehicle on the streets, but exceptsvehicles which have upon them business notices or advertisements of theproducts of the owner and which are not used merely or mainly foradvertising. An express company, which sold space on the exterior sidesof its trucks for advertising and which operated such trucks on thestreets, was convicted and fined for violating the ordinance.…