Date d'édition : 2025
Langue: anglais
Vendeur : S N Books World, Delhi, Inde
EUR 21,19
Autre deviseQuantité disponible : 18 disponible(s)
Ajouter au panierLeatherbound. Etat : NEW. BOOKS ARE EXEMPT FROM IMPORT DUTIES AND TARIFFS; NO EXTRA CHARGES APPLY. Leather Binding on Spine and Corners with Golden leaf printing on spine. Bound in genuine leather with Satin ribbon page markers and Spine with raised gilt bands. A perfect gift for your loved ones. Reprinted from 1864 edition. NO changes have been made to the original text. This is NOT a retyped or an ocr'd reprint. Illustrations, Index, if any, are included in black and white. Each page is checked manually before printing. As this print on demand book is reprinted from a very old book, there could be some missing or flawed pages, but we always try to make the book as complete as possible. Fold-outs, if any, are not part of the book. If the original book was published in multiple volumes then this reprint is of only one volume, not the whole set and contains approximately 24 pages. IF YOU WISH TO ORDER PARTICULAR VOLUME OR ALL THE VOLUMES YOU CAN CONTACT US. Resized as per current standards. Sewing binding for longer life, where the book block is actually sewn (smythe sewn/section sewn) with thread before binding which results in a more durable type of binding. Language: English.
Edité par Bulletin Job Office, Norwich [CT], 1864
Vendeur : Rulon-Miller Books (ABAA / ILAB), St. Paul, MN, Etats-Unis
Edition originale
EUR 93,84
Autre deviseQuantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Ajouter au panierFirst edition, 8vo, pp. 13; original printed tan wrappers; fine. Nathaniel Hayward (1808-1865), a man without any training at all in chemistry, spent some years experimenting with ways to keep India rubber from becoming soft and sticky in summer. He first discovered the value of sulfur in rubber compounding in 1836. Continuing his experiments he subjected his sulfur-treated rubber to the heat of the sun's rays, particularly anticipating the process of vulcanization. In 1838 he met Charles Goodyear, and eventually assigned the rights to his new process to him, and later assisted Goodyear in his experiments on vulcanization. In this petition to Congress, Hayward argues that the renewal of the patent for the process of combining sulfur with India rubber should be assigned to him, and not to Charles Goodyear. He explains that although he assigned the rights of the first patent to Goodyear in 1839, he did so only for a period of 14 years, and that the Patent Office has illegally denied him an extension of the patent on his own product.
Edité par Bulletin Job Office, Norwich [CT], 1864
Vendeur : Rulon-Miller Books (ABAA / ILAB), St. Paul, MN, Etats-Unis
Edition originale
EUR 220,80
Autre deviseQuantité disponible : 1 disponible(s)
Ajouter au panierFirst edition, 8vo, pp. 13; original printed tan wrappers; fine. Together with: Application of Nathaniel Hayward for an Extension of his Patent for his Invention for using Sulphur with India Rubber, before the Committee of Patents. Brief. E. S. Day Counsel. Washington: Gideon & pearson, printers, 1865, pp. 7, [1]; small dampstain at the for-edge, otherwise fine in original printed tan wrappers. Together with: Some Account of Nathaniel Hayward's Experiments with India Rubber, which Resulted in Discovering the Invaluable Compound of that Article with Sulpher. Norwich, Conn.: Bulletin Job Office, Franklin Square, 1865, pp. 12; original printed tan wrappers; fine. Nathaniel Hayward (1808-1865), a man without any training at all in chemistry, spent some years experimenting with ways to keep India rubber from becoming soft and sticky in summer. He first discovered the value of sulfur in rubber compounding in 1836. Continuing his experiments he subjected his sulfur-treated rubber to the heat of the sun's rays, particularly anticipating the process of vulcanization. In 1838 he met Charles Goodyear, and eventually assigned the rights to his new process to him, and later assisted Goodyear in his experiments on vulcanization. In his petition to Congress, Hayward argues that the renewal of the patent for the process of combining sulfur with India rubber should be assigned to him, and not to Charles Goodyear. He explains that although he assigned the rights of the first patent to Goodyear in 1839, he did so only for a period of 14 years, and that the Patent Office has illegally denied him an extension of the patent on his own product.