ISBN: 9788886140706 (2 résultats)

- Couverture souple
Vendeur : World of Books (was SecondSale), Montgomery, IL, Etats-UnisWorld of Books (was SecondSale)
Contacter le vendeurVendeur avec une évaluation de 5 étoilesEtat: Occasion - Satisfaisant
EUR 7,14
Frais de port gratuitsExpédition nationale : Etats-UnisQuantité disponible : 2 disponibles
Paperback. Etat : Good. A long-time leader in Evidence courses for its authority, timeliness, and flexibility, Mueller, Kirkpatrick, and Richter's Federal Rules of Evidence, 2022 Edition continues to provide the latest developments in evidence law. New to the 2022 Edition: The Federal Rules as amended through December 2021 Proposed Amendments to Rules 106, 615, and 702 that have been published for notice and comment Notes on the Supreme Court's 2019 decision in the Rehaif case relating to evidence of prior crimes offered in felon-in-possession trials The opinion of Justices Gorsuch and Sotomayor dissenting from the denial of review in Stuart v. Alabama, which would have addressed problems in presenting forensic laboratory evidence Proposed-but-rejected provisions on privileges, which Congress refused to enact when the Rules were first promulgated.…

- Couverture souple
Vendeur : World of Books Inc, Montgomery, IL, Etats-UnisWorld of Books Inc
Contacter le vendeurVendeur avec une évaluation de 4 étoilesEtat: Occasion - Satisfaisant
EUR 8,98
Frais de port gratuitsExpédition nationale : Etats-UnisQuantité disponible : 2 disponibles
Paperback. Etat : Good. A long-time leader in Evidence courses for its authority, timeliness, and flexibility, Mueller, Kirkpatrick, and Richter's Federal Rules of Evidence, 2022 Edition continues to provide the latest developments in evidence law. New to the 2022 Edition: The Federal Rules as amended through December 2021 Proposed Amendments to Rules 106, 615, and 702 that have been published for notice and comment Notes on the Supreme Court's 2019 decision in the Rehaif case relating to evidence of prior crimes offered in felon-in-possession trials The opinion of Justices Gorsuch and Sotomayor dissenting from the denial of review in Stuart v. Alabama, which would have addressed problems in presenting forensic laboratory evidence Proposed-but-rejected provisions on privileges, which Congress refused to enact when the Rules were first promulgated.…