Fertmann martin (15 résultats)

Etat : very_good. Gently read. May have name of previous ownership, or ex-library edition. Binding tight; spine straight and smooth, with no creasing; covers clean and crisp. Minimal signs of handling or shelving. 100% GUARANTEE! Shipped with delivery confirmation, if you're not satisfied with purchase please return item! Ships USPS Media Mail.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -The datafication and digitalisation of business models and decision-making processes have led to calls for more transparency, but at the same time question of suitable concepts to address these issues are raised. The contributions collected in this volume, which address various areas of law, examine from a jurisprudential perspective whether and under what conditions transparency should or can be granted and to what extent already existing transparency concepts can be successfully implemented. They are all contributions to the discussion of the 2nd Conference of the Research Network Young Digital Law, which took place on 22 and 23 July 2022 at the University of Hamburg.With contributions byMarco Billi, Dr. Jonas Botta, Dr. Gordian Konstantin Ebner, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Elena Freisinger, Joris Krijger, Dr. Tobias Mast, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Juliane Mendelsohn, Paul Nolan, Alessandro Parenti, Kostina Prifti, Dr. Patrick Raschner, Dr. Christopher Rennig, David Schneeberger, Prof. Dr. Evert Stamhuis, Tamara Thuis and Prof. Dr. Thomas Wischmeyer. 251 pp. Englisch, Deutsch.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Transparency or Opacity | A Legal Analysis of the Organization of Information in the Digital World | Simone Kuhlmann (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | 251 S. | Deutsch | 2023 | Nomos | EAN 9783756000272 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Waldseestr. 3-5, 76530 Baden-Baden, nomos[at]nomos[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. …

PAP. Etat : New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Paperback. Etat : Brand New. 235 pages. German language. 6.06x0.55x9.02 inches. In Stock.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -Martin Fertmann explores how Meta's Oversight Board has evolved into a significant actor shaping international human rights standards in online content moderation. Covering Facebook, Instagram, and Threads from 2020 to 2024, the analysis is grounded in the Board's founding documents, 65 decisions, and four advisory opinions. It reconstructs both the Board's self-description and its external perception, tracing its emergence as a source of normative authority within the digital sphere. Using a rule-theoretical approach inspired by H. L. A. Hart's concept of secondary rules, the author examines the Board's internal validation structures and decision-making powers. Complementing this legal-theoretical framework, the study employs the spiral model of human rights socialization from international relations to contextualize the diffusion of human rights norms into private regulation. The findings show that while the Board was initially bound to Meta's internal rules, it increasingly grounds its reasoning in international human rights standards derived from the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This shift establishes a normative hierarchy placing human rights above contractual terms. The study further demonstrates how the Board mediates between Meta, NGOs, and international institutions, gradually narrowing Meta's discretion and institutionalizing human rights within corporate governance. It thereby provides a rigorous contribution to debates on transnational norm formation and digital constitutionalism.; Martin Fertmann beleuchtet die Entwicklung des von Meta geschaffenen Oversight Boards zu einem zentralen Akteur bei der Herausbildung internationaler Menschenrechtsstandards in der Inhaltemoderation. Er untersucht die Plattformen Facebook, Instagram und Threads im Zeitraum von 2020 bis 2024. Auf Basis einer umfassenden Auswertung der Gründungsdokumente, 65 Entscheidungen und vier Stellungnahmen rekonstruiert der Autor die Selbst- und Fremdbeschreibung des Oversight Boards und analysiert seine wachsende normative Autorität. Ausgangspunkt ist ein regeltheoretischer Ansatz, der auf H.L.A. Harts Konzept der sekundären Regeln zurückgreift, um interne Geltungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsbefugnisse zu bestimmen. Ergänzend wird das Spiralmodell der Menschenrechtssozialisation herangezogen, um den Prozess der Integration internationaler Normen in private Regelsysteme zu erfassen. Die Analyse zeigt, dass das Oversight Board ursprünglich auf die privaten Regelwerke Metas beschränkt war, sich jedoch zunehmend an internationalen Menschenrechtsstandards orientiert. Diese Entwicklung begründet eine Hierarchie, in der internationale Normen über den Nutzungsbedingungen stehen. Des Weiteren zeigt die Studie, wie das Oversight Board zwischen Meta, internationalen Organisationen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren vermittelt und durch öffentliche Stellungnahmen sowie Antwortpflichten rekursive Diskurse erzeugt. Damit verengt sich Metas Handlungsspielraum, während sich eine institutionelle Verankerung menschenrechtlicher Prinzipien in der Unternehmenspraxis vollzieht. Die Arbeit leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Analyse der Entstehung transnationaler Normautorität im digitalen Raum. 235 pp. Deutsch.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -Martin Fertmann explores how Meta's Oversight Board has evolved into a significant actor shaping international human rights standards in online content moderation. Covering Facebook, Instagram, and Threads from 2020 to 2024, the analysis is grounded in the Board's founding documents, 65 decisions, and four advisory opinions. It reconstructs both the Board's self-description and its external perception, tracing its emergence as a source of normative authority within the digital sphere. Using a rule-theoretical approach inspired by H. L. A. Hart's concept of secondary rules, the author examines the Board's internal validation structures and decision-making powers. Complementing this legal-theoretical framework, the study employs the spiral model of human rights socialization from international relations to contextualize the diffusion of human rights norms into private regulation. The findings show that while the Board was initially bound to Meta's internal rules, it increasingly grounds its reasoning in international human rights standards derived from the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This shift establishes a normative hierarchy placing human rights above contractual terms. The study further demonstrates how the Board mediates between Meta, NGOs, and international institutions, gradually narrowing Meta's discretion and institutionalizing human rights within corporate governance. It thereby provides a rigorous contribution to debates on transnational norm formation and digital constitutionalism.; Martin Fertmann beleuchtet die Entwicklung des von Meta geschaffenen Oversight Boards zu einem zentralen Akteur bei der Herausbildung internationaler Menschenrechtsstandards in der Inhaltemoderation. Er untersucht die Plattformen Facebook, Instagram und Threads im Zeitraum von 2020 bis 2024. Auf Basis einer umfassenden Auswertung der Gründungsdokumente, 65 Entscheidungen und vier Stellungnahmen rekonstruiert der Autor die Selbst- und Fremdbeschreibung des Oversight Boards und analysiert seine wachsende normative Autorität. Ausgangspunkt ist ein regeltheoretischer Ansatz, der auf H.L.A. Harts Konzept der sekundären Regeln zurückgreift, um interne Geltungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsbefugnisse zu bestimmen. Ergänzend wird das Spiralmodell der Menschenrechtssozialisation herangezogen, um den Prozess der Integration internationaler Normen in private Regelsysteme zu erfassen. Die Analyse zeigt, dass das Oversight Board ursprünglich auf die privaten Regelwerke Metas beschränkt war, sich jedoch zunehmend an internationalen Menschenrechtsstandards orientiert. Diese Entwicklung begründet eine Hierarchie, in der internationale Normen über den Nutzungsbedingungen stehen. Des Weiteren zeigt die Studie, wie das Oversight Board zwischen Meta, internationalen Organisationen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren vermittelt und durch öffentliche Stellungnahmen sowie Antwortpflichten rekursive Diskurse erzeugt. Damit verengt sich Metas Handlungsspielraum, während sich eine institutionelle Verankerung menschenrechtlicher Prinzipien in der Unternehmenspraxis vollzieht. Die Arbeit leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Analyse der Entstehung transnationaler Normautorität im digitalen Raum. 235 pp. Deutsch.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -Martin Fertmann explores how Meta's Oversight Board has evolved into a significant actor shaping international human rights standards in online content moderation. Covering Facebook, Instagram, and Threads from 2020 to 2024, the analysis is grounded in the Board's founding documents, 65 decisions, and four advisory opinions. It reconstructs both the Board's self-description and its external perception, tracing its emergence as a source of normative authority within the digital sphere. Using a rule-theoretical approach inspired by H. L. A. Hart's concept of secondary rules, the author examines the Board's internal validation structures and decision-making powers. Complementing this legal-theoretical framework, the study employs the spiral model of human rights socialization from international relations to contextualize the diffusion of human rights norms into private regulation. The findings show that while the Board was initially bound to Meta's internal rules, it increasingly grounds its reasoning in international human rights standards derived from the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This shift establishes a normative hierarchy placing human rights above contractual terms. The study further demonstrates how the Board mediates between Meta, NGOs, and international institutions, gradually narrowing Meta's discretion and institutionalizing human rights within corporate governance. It thereby provides a rigorous contribution to debates on transnational norm formation and digital constitutionalism.…

Etat : New.

Etat : New.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware - Martin Fertmann explores how Meta's Oversight Board has evolved into a significant actor shaping international human rights standards in online content moderation. Covering Facebook, Instagram, and Threads from 2020 to 2024, the analysis is grounded in the Board's founding documents, 65 decisions, and four advisory opinions. It reconstructs both the Board's self-description and its external perception, tracing its emergence as a source of normative authority within the digital sphere. Using a rule-theoretical approach inspired by H. L. A. Hart's concept of secondary rules, the author examines the Board's internal validation structures and decision-making powers. Complementing this legal-theoretical framework, the study employs the spiral model of human rights socialization from international relations to contextualize the diffusion of human rights norms into private regulation. The findings show that while the Board was initially bound to Meta's internal rules, it increasingly grounds its reasoning in international human rights standards derived from the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This shift establishes a normative hierarchy placing human rights above contractual terms. The study further demonstrates how the Board mediates between Meta, NGOs, and international institutions, gradually narrowing Meta's discretion and institutionalizing human rights within corporate governance. It thereby provides a rigorous contribution to debates on transnational norm formation and digital constitutionalism.; Martin Fertmann beleuchtet die Entwicklung des von Meta geschaffenen Oversight Boards zu einem zentralen Akteur bei der Herausbildung internationaler Menschenrechtsstandards in der Inhaltemoderation. Er untersucht die Plattformen Facebook, Instagram und Threads im Zeitraum von 2020 bis 2024. Auf Basis einer umfassenden Auswertung der Gründungsdokumente, 65 Entscheidungen und vier Stellungnahmen rekonstruiert der Autor die Selbst- und Fremdbeschreibung des Oversight Boards und analysiert seine wachsende normative Autorität. Ausgangspunkt ist ein regeltheoretischer Ansatz, der auf H.L.A. Harts Konzept der sekundären Regeln zurückgreift, um interne Geltungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsbefugnisse zu bestimmen. Ergänzend wird das Spiralmodell der Menschenrechtssozialisation herangezogen, um den Prozess der Integration internationaler Normen in private Regelsysteme zu erfassen. Die Analyse zeigt, dass das Oversight Board ursprünglich auf die privaten Regelwerke Metas beschränkt war, sich jedoch zunehmend an internationalen Menschenrechtsstandards orientiert. Diese Entwicklung begründet eine Hierarchie, in der internationale Normen über den Nutzungsbedingungen stehen. Des Weiteren zeigt die Studie, wie das Oversight Board zwischen Meta, internationalen Organisationen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren vermittelt und durch öffentliche Stellungnahmen sowie Antwortpflichten rekursive Diskurse erzeugt. Damit verengt sich Metas Handlungsspielraum, während sich eine institutionelle Verankerung menschenrechtlicher Prinzipien in der Unternehmenspraxis vollzieht. Die Arbeit leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Analyse der Entstehung transnationaler Normautorität im digitalen Raum.…

Etat : New.

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Neuware -Martin Fertmann explores how Meta's Oversight Board has evolved into a significant actor shaping international human rights standards in online content moderation. Covering Facebook, Instagram, and Threads from 2020 to 2024, the analysis is grounded in the Board's founding documents, 65 decisions, and four advisory opinions. It reconstructs both the Board's self-description and its external perception, tracing its emergence as a source of normative authority within the digital sphere. Using a rule-theoretical approach inspired by H. L. A. Hart's concept of secondary rules, the author examines the Board's internal validation structures and decision-making powers. Complementing this legal-theoretical framework, the study employs the spiral model of human rights socialization from international relations to contextualize the diffusion of human rights norms into private regulation. The findings show that while the Board was initially bound to Meta's internal rules, it increasingly grounds its reasoning in international human rights standards derived from the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This shift establishes a normative hierarchy placing human rights above contractual terms. The study further demonstrates how the Board mediates between Meta, NGOs, and international institutions, gradually narrowing Meta's discretion and institutionalizing human rights within corporate governance. It thereby provides a rigorous contribution to debates on transnational norm formation and digital constitutionalism.Jana Trispel, Wilhelmstraße, 18, 72074 Tübingen 235 pp. Deutsch.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. Menschenrechtssozialisation auf Online-Plattformen | Zur Selbst- und Fremdbeschreibung des Meta Oversight Boards | Martin Fertmann | Taschenbuch | Internet und Gesellschaft | 235 S. | Deutsch | 2026 | Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. K | EAN 9783162000859 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Jana Trispel, Wilhelmstr. 18, 72074 Tübingen, trispel[at]mohrsiebeck[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.…

Taschenbuch. Etat : Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - The datafication and digitalisation of business models and decision-making processes have led to calls for more transparency, but at the same time question of suitable concepts to address these issues are raised. The contributions collected in this volume, which address various areas of law, examine from a jurisprudential perspective whether and under what conditions transparency should or can be granted and to what extent already existing transparency concepts can be successfully implemented. They are all contributions to the discussion of the 2nd Conference of the Research Network Young Digital Law, which took place on 22 and 23 July 2022 at the University of Hamburg.With contributions byMarco Billi, Dr. Jonas Botta, Dr. Gordian Konstantin Ebner, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Elena Freisinger, Joris Krijger, Dr. Tobias Mast, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Juliane Mendelsohn, Paul Nolan, Alessandro Parenti, Kostina Prifti, Dr. Patrick Raschner, Dr. Christopher Rennig, David Schneeberger, Prof. Dr. Evert Stamhuis, Tamara Thuis and Prof. Dr. Thomas Wischmeyer.…